When it comes to DMCA takedowns, Grooveshark is generally a company that likes to receive. But now, it turns out they also give on occasion.
Grooveshark (through parent Escape Media Group) appears to have sent this DMCA takedown notice to developers using their source code illegally. Grooveshark didn't respond to the email listed on this takedown notice, which was posted on github (an inquiry was also sent to Grooveshark CEO Sam Tarantino.)
And, this would be the familiar result.
Netflix pays millions to license and produce content legitimately, and is willing to pay millions more. Yet their very existence is threatened by studios and channels that won't give them their stuff, at least at rates that make sense.
So why, given these issues, would Netflix directly sponsor Grooveshark, a company that bypasses all of these problems with a free, loophole-based streaming alternative? Especially when this same company could just as easily expand into video with the exact same approach? A company that is paying pricey lawyers right now to win that right?
Why would anyone feed a company that not only disagrees with your core principles, but might become a serious competitor in the future?
Updated (March 28th, 10 pm PCT): There's been some confusion over ad networks and whether Netflix knows about this ad. The answer is yes: this is a full-blown, customized wallpaper ad that was purchased with Netflix's knowledge. This isn't 'scrap inventory,' and only a small number of other advertisers enjoy this level of exposure and takeover placement.
Top image: beactive (CC 2.0 Generic)